Objectives. Observational studies indicate that tea intake is associated with a decreased risk of kidney stones. Here we performed a mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate whether this association is causal. Methods. Forty-four independent genetic variants strongly associated with tea intake were identified from a large genome-wide association study, including 448060 individuals of the UK Biobank. We additionally obtained genome-wide association study summary statistics for kidney stones from the FinnGen consortium (5985 cases and 253943 controls) and UK Biobank (6536 cases and 388508 controls). Random-effect inverse variance weighted regression was used to evaluate causal estimates. The random-effect inverse variance weighted estimates based on the FinnGen consortium and UK Biobank were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Other MR methods, including MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier, were also performed to test the robustness of our results. Results. In a combined sample of 12521 cases and 642451 controls,...
Skip Nav Destination
Journal Article|
February 23 2023
Tea intake and risk of kidney stones: a mendelian randomization study.
Mengmeng Wang, Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China. E-mail wangmeng_neuro@163.com
Journal: Nutrition
Citation: Nutrition (2023) 107
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111919
Published: 2023
Citation
Dandan Liu, Jiao Wang, Yanan Chen, Fenfen Liu, Yue Deng, Mengmeng Wang; Tea intake and risk of kidney stones: a mendelian randomization study.. IFIS Food and Health Sciences Database 2023; doi:
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your Institution
Analyse Trends
Explore publication trends in the sciences of food and health.
Discover and compare the use of keywords over time.
Find global trends in research through publication categories.