Background. The NOVA classification distinguishes foods by level of processing, with evidence suggesting that ultra-processed foods (UPF) lead to obesity. The Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG), in contrast, discourage excess consumption of "discretionary foods" (DF), distinguished by their high saturated fat, added-sugars, alcohol, or sodium content. There is limited research that compares the classification systems in predicting health outcomes. Aim. To compare DF with UPF for predicting energy intake, body mass index (BMI) and nutrient composition in Australia. Methods. Participants in the Australian Health Survey 2011 to 12 were classified into tertiles of percentage energy (%E) from DF and UPF. Generalised-linear-models, adjusted for confounders, were used to assess outcomes. Results. Forty-one%E came from UPF and 34.4%E came from DF. Non-protein energy intake increased 2134 kJ between lowest and highest tertile of DF (P <.001) and 780 kJ for UPF (P <.001). Protein-energy remained relatively constant across the tertiles. After...
A comparison of Australian Dietary Guidelines to NOVA food classification system in predicting energy intakes, body mass index and nutrient density of the diet of Australian adults.
The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Grech, A., Rangan, A., Simpson, S., Gill, T., Raubenheimer, D.; A comparison of Australian Dietary Guidelines to NOVA food classification system in predicting energy intakes, body mass index and nutrient density of the diet of Australian adults.. IFIS Food and Health Sciences Database 2022; doi:
Download citation file: